The American Indian and Alaska Native Population

Contributed by:
Steve
This booklet provides a portrait of the American Indian and Alaska Native population in the United States and discusses that population’s distribution at the national level and at lower levels of geography.
1. The American Indian and Alaska
Native Population: 2010 Issued January 2012
2010 Census Briefs
C2010BR-10
INTRODUCTION By
Tina Norris,
Figure 1.
According to the 2010 Census, Paula L. Vines,
Reproduction of the Question on and
5.2 million people in the United States Race From the 2010 Census Elizabeth M. Hoeffel
identified as American Indian and
Alaska Native, either alone or in com-
bination with one or more other races.
Out of this total, 2.9 million people
identified as American Indian and
Alaska Native alone. Almost half of
the American Indian and Alaska Native
population, or 2.3 million people,
reported being American Indian and
Alaska Native in combination with one
or more other races. The American
Indian and Alaska Native in combina-
tion population experienced rapid
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census questionnaire.
growth, increasing by 39 percent
since 2000.
This report provides a portrait of districts.2 Data for this report also
the American Indian and Alaska Native come from the 2010 Census Summary
population in the United States and dis- File 1, which was the first 2010 Census
cusses that population’s distribution at the data product to provide information on
national level and at lower levels of geog- selected detailed American Indian and
raphy.1 It is part of a series that analyzes Alaska Native tribal groupings, such as
population and housing data collected Navajo, Cherokee, or Inupiat.3, 4
from the 2010 Census.
The data for this report are based on the
2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public
2
Information on the 2010 Census Redistricting
Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File is available
Law 94-171) Summary File, which was the online at first 2010 Census data product released /redistricting-data.php>.
3
Information on the 2010 Census Summary File 1
with data on race and Hispanic origin, is available online at including information on the American /press-kits/summary-file-1.html>.
4
American Indian tribal groupings refer to the
Indian and Alaska Native population, combining of individual American Indian tribes, such
and was provided to each state for use as Fort Sill Apache, Mescalero Apache, and San Carlos
Apache, into the general Apache tribal grouping. For
in drawing boundaries for legislative Alaska Natives, tribal groupings refer to the combining
of individual Alaska Native tribes, such as King Salmon
1
This report discusses data for the 50 states and Tribe, Native Village of Kanatak, and Sun’aq Tribe of
the District of Columbia, but not Puerto Rico. Kodiak, into the general Aleut tribal grouping.
U.S. Department of Commerce
Economics and Statistics Administration
U.S. CENSUS BUREAU
2. UNDERSTANDING RACE
DATA FROM THE 2010 DEFINITION OF AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA
CENSUS NATIVE USED IN THE 2010 CENSUS
The 2010 Census used According to OMB, “American Indian or Alaska Native” refers to a
federal standards to collect person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and
and present data on race. South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal
For the 2010 Census, the question affiliation or community attachment.
on race was asked of individu-
The American Indian and Alaska Native population includes people
als living in the United States (see
who marked the “American Indian or Alaska Native” checkbox or
Figure 1). An individual’s response
reported entries such as Navajo, Blackfeet, Inupiat, Yup’ik, or Central
to the race question was based
American Indian groups or South American Indian groups.
upon self-identification. The U.S.
Census Bureau collects information
on race following the guidance of
for respondents to identify with In Census 2000, for the first time,
the U.S. Office of Management and
more than one race. The definition individuals were presented with the
Budget’s (OMB) 1997 Revisions to
of the American Indian or Alaska option to self-identify with more
the Standards for the Classification
Native racial category used in the than one race, and this continued
of Federal Data on Race and
2010 Census is presented in the with the 2010 Census, as pre-
Ethnicity.5 These federal standards
text box above. scribed by OMB. There are 57 pos-
mandate that race and Hispanic
sible multiple-race combinations
origin (ethnicity) are separate and Data on race have been collected
involving the five OMB race catego-
distinct concepts and that when since the first U.S. decennial census
ries and Some Other Race.8
collecting these data via self-­ in 1790. The 1860 Census was the
identification, two different ques- first to enumerate American Indians The 2010 Census question on race
tions must be used.6 as a separate race group, and the included 15 separate response
1890 Census was the first to count categories and three areas where
Starting in 1997, OMB required
American Indians throughout the respondents could write in detailed
federal agencies to use a minimum
country. Alaska Natives, in Alaska, information about their race (see
of five race categories: White, Black
have been counted in various Figure 1).9 The response catego-
or African American, American
respects since the 1880 Census, ries and write-in answers can be
Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and
generally under the American combined to create the five mini-
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Indian category, but were enumer- mum OMB race categories plus
Islander. For respondents unable
ated as a separate group starting Some Other Race. In addition to
to identify with any of these five
with the 1940 Census. All states White, Black or African American,
race categories, OMB approved
began collecting data separately American Indian and Alaska Native,
the Census Bureau’s inclusion of
for Eskimos and Aleuts in 1980.
a sixth category—Some Other 8
The 2010 Census provides information
Census 2000 used a combined on the population reporting more than one
Race—on the Census 2000 and
response category, “American race, as well as detailed race combinations
2010 Census questionnaires. The (e.g., American Indian and Alaska Native and
Indian or Alaska Native,” and a
1997 OMB standards also allowed White; American Indian and Alaska Native
dedicated write-in line to collect and White and Black or African American). In
5
The 1997 Revisions to the Standards for this report, the multiple-race categories are
information on the American Indian denoted with the conjunction and in bold
the Classification of Federal Data on Race and
Ethnicity, issued by OMB, is available at and Alaska Native population, and italicized print to indicate the separate
which is similar to the way in which combination.
6
The OMB requires federal agencies to the data were collected for the 9
There were two changes to the question
use a minimum of two ethnicities: Hispanic on race for the 2010 Census. First, the word-
2010 Census.7
or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino. Hispanic ing of the race question was changed from
origin can be viewed as the heritage, “What is this person’s race? Mark  one or
nationality group, lineage, or country of more races to indicate what this person con-
birth of the person or the person’s parents or siders himself/herself to be” in 2000 to “What
ancestors before their arrival in the United 7
For information about comparability is this person’s race? Mark  one or more
States. People who identify their origin as of 2010 Census data on race and Hispanic boxes” for 2010. Second, in 2010, examples
Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be of any origin to data collected in previous censuses, were added to the “Other Asian” response
race. “Hispanic or Latino” refers to a person see the 2010 Census Redistricting Data category (Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani,
of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or (Public Law 94-171) Summary File—Technical Cambodian, and so on) and the “Other Pacific
Central American, or other Spanish culture or Documentation at origin regardless of race. /cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf>. and so on). In 2000, no examples were given
in the race question.
2 U.S. Census Bureau
3. and Some Other Race, 7 of the reporting American Indian and results for each of these groups
15 response categories are Asian Alaska Native. and highlights the diversity within
groups and 4 are Native Hawaiian the entire American Indian and
Second, individuals who chose
and Other Pacific Islander groups.10 Alaska Native population.13
more than one of the six race cat-
For a complete explanation of the egories are referred to as the race THE AMERICAN INDIAN
race categories used in the 2010 in combination population, or as AND ALASKA NATIVE
Census, see the 2010 Census Brief, the group who reported more than POPULATION: A SNAPSHOT
Overview of Race and Hispanic one race. For example, respondents
Origin: 2010.11 who reported they were American The 2010 Census showed that the
Indian and Alaska Native and White U.S. population on April 1, 2010,
RACE ALONE, RACE IN or reported they were American was 308.7 million. Out of the total
COMBINATION, AND RACE Indian and Alaska Native and White U.S. population, 2.9 million people,
ALONE-OR-IN-COMBINATION and Black would be included in the or 0.9 percent, were American
CONCEPTS American Indian and Alaska Native Indian and Alaska Native alone (see
in combination population.12 This Table 1). In addition, 2.3 million
This report presents data for the
population is also referred to as the people, or another 0.7 percent,
American Indian and Alaska Native
multiple-race American Indian and reported American Indian and
population and focuses on results
Alaska Native population. Alaska Native in combination with
for three major conceptual groups.
one or more other races.14 Together,
First, people who responded to Third, the maximum number of these two groups totaled 5.2 mil-
the question on race by indicating people reporting American Indian lion people. Thus, 1.7 percent of all
only one race are referred to as the or Alaska Native is reflected in people in the United States identi-
race alone population, or the group the American Indian and Alaska fied as American Indian and Alaska
who reported only one race. For Native alone-or-in-combination Native, either alone or in combina-
example, respondents who marked population. One way to define tion with one or more other races.
only the “American Indian or Alaska the American Indian and Alaska
Native” category on the census Native population is to combine The American Indian and
those respondents who reported Alaska Native population
questionnaire would be included
American Indian and Alaska Native increased at a faster rate than
in the American Indian and
the total population.
Alaska Native alone population. alone with those who reported
Respondents who reported more American Indian and Alaska The total U.S. population grew by
than one tribe, such as Navajo and Native in combination with one 9.7 percent, from 281.4 million
Pima, would also be included in or more other races. The addition in 2000 to 308.7 million in 2010
the American Indian and Alaska of these two groups creates the (see Table 1). In comparison, the
Native alone population. The American Indian and Alaska Native American Indian and Alaska Native
American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-­combination popula- alone population increased almost
alone population can be viewed as tion. Another way to think of the twice as fast as the total U.S.
the minimum number of people American Indian and Alaska Native
alone-or-in-combination popula-
13
As a matter of policy, the Census Bureau
does not advocate the use of the alone
tion is the total number of people population over the alone-or-in-combination
10
The race categories included in the who reported American Indian or population or vice versa. The use of the alone
census questionnaire generally reflect a social population in sections of this report does not
definition of race recognized in this country Alaska Native, whether or not they imply that it is a preferred method of pre-
and are not an attempt to define race biologi- reported any other race(s). senting or analyzing data. The same is true
cally, anthropologically, or genetically. In addi- for sections of this report that focus on the
tion, it is recognized that the categories of alone-or-in-combination population. Data on
the race question include race and national
Throughout the report, the discus- race from the 2010 Census can be presented
origin or sociocultural groups. sion of the American Indian and and discussed in a variety of ways.
11
Humes, K., N. Jones, and R. Ramirez. 14
For the purposes of this report, the
Alaska Native population includes
2011. Overview of Race and Hispanic ­ terms “reported,” “identified,” and “classi-
Origin: 2010, U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 fied” are used interchangeably to refer to the
Census Briefs, C2010BR-02, available at 12
The terms “Black” and “Black or African response provided by respondents as well as
/c2010br-02.pdf>. report. imputation process.
U.S. Census Bureau 3
4. Table 1.
American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2000 and 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
2000 2010 Change, 2000 to 2010
Race Percentage Percentage
of total of total
Number population Number population Number Percent
    Total population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281,421,906 100.0 308,745,538 100.0 27,323,632 9.7
American Indian and Alaska Native alone or
in combination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,119,301 1.5 5,220,579 1.7 1,101,278 26.7
American Indian and Alaska Native alone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,475,956 0.9 2,932,248 0.9 456,292 18.4
American Indian and Alaska Native in combination. . . . . . . . . 1,643,345 0.6 2,288,331 0.7 644,986 39.2
   American Indian and Alaska Native; White. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,082,683 0.4 1,432,309 0.5 349,626 32.3
   American Indian and Alaska Native; Black or
   African American . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182,494 0.1 269,421 0.1 86,927 47.6
   American Indian and Alaska Native; White; Black or
   African American . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112,207 – 230,848 0.1 118,641 105.7
   American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race. . . . 93,842 – 115,752 – 21,910 23.3
   American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,429 – 58,829 – 6,400 12.2
All other combinations including American Indian and
   Alaska Native. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119,690 – 181,172 0.1 61,482 51.4
Not American Indian and Alaska Native alone or
in combination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277,302,605 98.5 303,524,959 98.3 26,222,354 9.5
– Percentage rounds to 0.0.
Note: In Census 2000, an error in data processing resulted in an overstatement of the Two or More Races population by about 1 million people (about 15
percent) nationally, which almost entirely affected race combinations involving Some Other Race. Therefore, data users should assess observed changes in race
combinations involving Some Other Race between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census with caution. Changes in specific race combinations not involving Some
Other Race, such as American Indian and Alaska Native and Black or African American, or American Indian and Alaska Native and Asian, generally should be
more comparable.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table PL1; and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law
94-171) Summary File, Table P1.
population, growing by 18 percent MULTIPLE-RACE REPORTING Other Pacific Islander popula-
from 2.5 million to 2.9 million.15, 16 AMONG THE AMERICAN tion had the largest percentage
INDIAN AND ALASKA (56 percent) reporting more than
The American Indian and Alaska
NATIVE POPULATION one race.18
Native alone-or-in-combination pop-
ulation experienced faster growth Nearly half of the American American Indians and Alaska
than both the total U.S. population Indian and Alaska Native Natives reporting more than
and the American Indian and Alaska population reported one race increased at a faster
Native alone population, growing multiple races. rate than the American Indian
by 27 percent from 4.1 million in Of the 5.2 million people who and Alaska Native alone
2000 to 5.2 million in 2010. population.
reported American Indian and
Alaska Native, 2.9 million identi- From 2000 to 2010, the multiple-
fied as American Indian and Alaska race American Indian and
15
Percentages shown in text generally are
rounded to the nearest integer, while those Native alone (see Table 1). An addi- Alaska Native population grew
shown in tables and figures are shown with tional 2.3 million people reported by 645,000. The multiple-race
decimals. All rounding is based on unrounded
calculations. Thus, due to rounding, some American Indian and Alaska Native American Indian and Alaska Native
percentages shown in tables and figures in combination with one or more population grew at a considerably
ending in “5” may round either up or down.
For example, unrounded numbers of 14.49 other races. Of the five OMB race faster rate (39 percent) than the
and 14.51 would both be shown as 14.5 in groups, the American Indian and American Indian and Alaska Native
a table, but would be cited in the text as 14
and 15, respectively. Alaska Native population had the alone population (18 percent) from
16
The observed changes in the race counts second-largest percentage (44 2000 to 2010 (see Table 1).
between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census
could be attributed to a number of factors. percent) reporting more than one
Demographic change since 2000, which race.17 The Native Hawaiian and
includes births and deaths in a geographic
area and migration in and out of a geographic 17
Humes, K., N. Jones, and R. Ramirez. 18
Information on national-level 2010
area, will have an impact on the resulting 2010 2011. Overview of Race and Hispanic Census redistricting data (Public Law
Census counts. Additionally, some changes in Origin: 2010, U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 94-171) for race groups is available online at
the race question’s wording and format since Census Briefs, C2010BR-02, available at Census 2000 could have influenced reporting ­.
patterns in the 2010 Census. /c2010br-02.pdf>.
4 U.S. Census Bureau
5. Among American Indians and
Alaska Natives, the largest Figure 2.
multiple-race combination was Percentage Distribution of the American Indian and
American Indian and Alaska Alaska Native Population by Region: 2000 and 2010
Native and White. (For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and
definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
Among the 2.3 million people
who reported they were American Northeast Midwest South West
Indian and Alaska Native and American Indian and 9.7 16.8 32.8 40.7 2010
one or more additional races, the Alaska Native alone or
majority (1.4 million or 63 per- in combination 9.1 17.4 30.6 43.0 2000
cent) identified as American Indian
18.3
and Alaska Native and White (see
Table 1). This was followed by American Indian and 7.3 15.6 31.5 45.6 2010
American Indian and Alaska Native Alaska Native alone
6.6 16.1 29.3 48.0 2000
and Black, with 269,000, and 18.4
by American Indian and Alaska
Native and White and Black, American Indian and 12.8 18.4 34.4 34.4 2010
with 231,000. Together, these Alaska Native
in combination 12.9 19.2 32.5 35.5 2000
three combinations accounted for
about 84 percent of all American Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 due to rounding.
Indians and Alaska Natives who Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171)
Summary File, Table PL1; and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171)
reported multiple races. Summary File, Table P1.
The American Indian and Alaska
Native and White and Black popu-
increasing from 1.1 million in 2000 by the Midwest and the Northeast.19
lation more than doubled in size,
to 1.4 million in 2010. However, This pattern was identical for the
from about 112,000 in 2000 to
as a proportion of the American American Indian and Alaska Native
231,000 in 2010. The American
Indian and Alaska Native in com- alone population, although an even
Indian and Alaska Native and White
bination population, the American higher proportion of the American
and Black population’s share of all
Indian and Alaska Native and White Indian and Alaska Native alone
multiple-race American Indians and
population decreased by about population resided in the West.
Alaska Natives also increased by
3 percentage points.
about 3 percentage points. The proportion of American
THE GEOGRAPHIC Indians and Alaska Natives
The American Indian and Alaska
DISTRIBUTION OF THE living in the West declined and
Native and Black population grew in the South increased.
by about one-half in size, increas- AMERICAN INDIAN
ing from 182,000 to 269,000 over
AND ALASKA NATIVE While the proportions of the
POPULATION American Indian and Alaska
the last 10 years. The American
Indian and Alaska Native and Black Native alone-or-in-combination
The largest proportion of the
population increased slightly as a population for the Northeast and
American Indian and Alaska
proportion of the American Indian Native population lived in the Midwest remained stable, the
and Alaska Native in combination West. proportions for the South and
population, rising by nearly 1 per- In the 2010 Census, 41 percent of 19
The Northeast census region includes
centage point. the American Indian and Alaska
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
The American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
The Midwest census region includes Illinois,
Native and White population population lived in the West (see Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota,
grew by about one-third in size, Figure 2). The South had the Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
South Dakota, and Wisconsin. The South
­second-largest proportion followed
census region includes Alabama, Arkansas,
Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West
Virginia. The West census region includes
Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii,
Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
U.S. Census Bureau 5
6. West changed slightly from 2000 The American Indian and Florida, and Michigan (see Table 2).
to 2010. Compared with 2000, Alaska Native population grew Among these states, three experi-
the proportion of the American in every region between 2000 enced substantial rates of growth
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or- and 2010. in their American Indian and Alaska
in-­combination population living The American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination pop-
in the South increased 2 percent- Native alone-or-in-combination ulations from 2000 to 2010­—Texas
age points, from 31 percent to population grew in every region (46 percent), North Carolina (40
33 percent, while the proportion between 2000 and 2010, led by 36 percent), and Florida (38 percent). In
living in the West declined by about percent growth in the South and 35 similar fashion, the American Indian
2 percentage points from 43 per- percent growth in the Northeast (see and Alaska Native alone population
cent to 41 percent. Table 2). In the West and Midwest, also experienced growth of at least
the American Indian and Alaska 20 percent in Texas, Florida, New
The proportion of the American
Native alone-or-in-­combination York, and North Carolina.
Indian and Alaska Native alone pop-
population increased as well, but at
ulation increased in the South, from Out of the ten states with the
slower rates.
29 percent to 32 percent, while the ­largest American Indian and Alaska
West experienced a decrease in the The American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination pop-
American Indian and Alaska Native Native alone population also ulations, eight also had the largest
alone population (from 48 percent increased in every region, but at American Indian and Alaska Native
to 46 percent). The proportions of slower rates than the alone-or- alone populations. Alaska and
the American Indian and Alaska in-combination population. The South Dakota replaced Michigan
Native alone population for the American Indian and Alaska Native and Florida among the states with
Northeast and Midwest remained alone population grew the most the ten largest American Indian and
fairly stable from 2000 to 2010. in the Northeast, increasing by Alaska Native alone populations.
31 percent.
The multiple-race American California and Oklahoma had
Indian and Alaska Native Multiple-race American the greatest shares of the
population was more Indians and Alaska Natives population who identified
geographically dispersed grew at an even faster rate as American Indian and
than the American Indian than the American Indian Alaska Native.
and Alaska Native alone and Alaska Native alone Of all respondents who identified
population. population.
as American Indian and Alaska
The multiple-race American Indian The American Indian and Alaska Native alone or in combination
and Alaska Native population had Native in combination population with another race, California had
a different regional population dis- experienced a 48 percent increase the largest percentage (14 per-
persion pattern compared with the over the decade in the South. In cent), followed by Oklahoma,
American Indian and Alaska Native the Northeast, the multiple-race Arizona, Texas, and New York
alone population (see Figure 2). American Indian and Alaska Native (see Figure 3). The pattern for the
In 2010, 13 percent of multiple- population experienced a 38 per- American Indian and Alaska Native
race American Indians and Alaska cent increase over the decade, fol- alone population was similar in that
Natives lived in the Northeast. lowed by a 35 percent increase in California, Oklahoma, and Arizona
This proportion was nearly twice the West and a 33 percent increase had the three largest shares of the
as high as the proportion of the in the Midwest. American Indian and Alaska Native
American Indian and Alaska Native alone population in the United
alone population that lived in the The majority of all people States. However, New Mexico and
Northeast. However, the proportion who reported American Indian Texas had the fourth- and fifth-
of multiple-race American Indians and Alaska Native lived in
largest American Indian and Alaska
and Alaska Natives in the West ten states.
Native alone population in the
(34 percent) was smaller com- The ten states with the largest United States.
pared with the proportion of the American Indian and Alaska Native
American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination populations The pattern was slightly different
alone population (46 percent). in 2010 were California, Oklahoma, for respondents who identified
Arizona, Texas, New York, New as American Indian and Alaska
Mexico, Washington, North Carolina, Native in combination with one or
6 U.S. Census Bureau
7. Table 2.
American Indian and Alaska Native Population for the United States, Regions, and States,
and for Puerto Rico: 2000 and 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
American Indian and Alaska Native American Indian
and Alaska
Native in
combination
Alone In combination as a
Area Alone or in combination
percentage
of alone or in
combination
Percent Percent Percent
2000 2010 change 2000 2010 change 2000 2010 change 2000 2010
United States . . . . 4,119,301 5,220,579 26 .7 2,475,956 2,932,248 18 .4 1,643,345 2,288,331 39 .2 39 .9 43 .8
Northeast . . . . . . . . . . . . 374,035 505,490 35 .1 162,558 212,864 30 .9 211,477 292,626 38 .4 56 .5 57 .9
Midwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . 714,792 879,438 23 .0 399,490 458,611 14 .8 315,302 420,827 33 .5 44 .1 47 .9
South . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,259,230 1,712,102 36 .0 725,919 923,783 27 .3 533,311 788,319 47 .8 42 .4 46 .0
West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,771,244 2,123,549 19 .9 1,187,989 1,336,990 12 .5 583,255 786,559 34 .9 32 .9 37 .0
Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,449 57,118 28 .5 22,430 28,218 25 .8 22,019 28,900 31 .3 49 .5 50 .6
Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119,241 138,312 16 .0 98,043 104,871 7 .0 21,198 33,441 57 .8 17 .8 24 .2
Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292,552 353,386 20 .8 255,879 296,529 15 .9 36,673 56,857 55 .0 12 .5 16 .1
Arkansas . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,002 47,588 28 .6 17,808 22,248 24 .9 19,194 25,340 32 .0 51 .9 53 .2
California . . . . . . . . . . . . 627,562 723,225 15 .2 333,346 362,801 8 .8 294,216 360,424 22 .5 46 .9 49 .8
Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,689 107,832 35 .3 44,241 56,010 26 .6 35,448 51,822 46 .2 44 .5 48 .1
Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . 24,488 31,140 27 .2 9,639 11,256 16 .8 14,849 19,884 33 .9 60 .6 63 .9
Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,069 9,899 63 .1 2,731 4,181 53 .1 3,338 5,718 71 .3 55 .0 57 .8
District of Columbia . . . . 4,775 6,521 36 .6 1,713 2,079 21 .4 3,062 4,442 45 .1 64 .1 68 .1
Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117,880 162,562 37 .9 53,541 71,458 33 .5 64,339 91,104 41 .6 54 .6 56 .0
Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,197 84,024 57 .9 21,737 32,151 47 .9 31,460 51,873 64 .9 59 .1 61 .7
Hawaii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,882 33,470 34 .5 3,535 4,164 17 .8 21,347 29,306 37 .3 85 .8 87 .6
Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,237 36,385 33 .6 17,645 21,441 21 .5 9,592 14,944 55 .8 35 .2 41 .1
Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,161 101,451 38 .7 31,006 43,963 41 .8 42,155 57,488 36 .4 57 .6 56 .7
Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,263 49,738 26 .7 15,815 18,462 16 .7 23,448 31,276 33 .4 59 .7 62 .9
Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,246 24,511 34 .3 8,989 11,084 23 .3 9,257 13,427 45 .0 50 .7 54 .8
Kansas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,363 59,130 24 .8 24,936 28,150 12 .9 22,427 30,980 38 .1 47 .4 52 .4
Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,552 31,355 27 .7 8,616 10,120 17 .5 15,936 21,235 33 .3 64 .9 67 .7
Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,878 55,079 28 .5 25,477 30,579 20 .0 17,401 24,500 40 .8 40 .6 44 .5
Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,156 18,482 40 .5 7,098 8,568 20 .7 6,058 9,914 63 .7 46 .0 53 .6
Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,437 58,657 48 .7 15,423 20,420 32 .4 24,014 38,237 59 .2 60 .9 65 .2
Massachusetts . . . . . . . . 38,050 50,705 33 .3 15,015 18,850 25 .5 23,035 31,855 38 .3 60 .5 62 .8
Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . 124,412 139,095 11 .8 58,479 62,007 6 .0 65,933 77,088 16 .9 53 .0 55 .4
Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . 81,074 101,900 25 .7 54,967 60,916 10 .8 26,107 40,984 57 .0 32 .2 40 .2
Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . 19,555 25,910 32 .5 11,652 15,030 29 .0 7,903 10,880 37 .7 40 .4 42 .0
Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,099 72,376 20 .4 25,076 27,376 9 .2 35,023 45,000 28 .5 58 .3 62 .2
Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,320 78,601 18 .5 56,068 62,555 11 .6 10,252 16,046 56 .5 15 .5 20 .4
Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,204 29,816 34 .3 14,896 18,427 23 .7 7,308 11,389 55 .8 32 .9 38 .2
Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,222 55,945 32 .5 26,420 32,062 21 .4 15,802 23,883 51 .1 37 .4 42 .7
New Hampshire . . . . . . . 7,885 10,524 33 .5 2,964 3,150 6 .3 4,921 7,374 49 .8 62 .4 70 .1
New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . 49,104 70,716 44 .0 19,492 29,026 48 .9 29,612 41,690 40 .8 60 .3 59 .0
New Mexico . . . . . . . . . . 191,475 219,512 14 .6 173,483 193,222 11 .4 17,992 26,290 46 .1 9 .4 12 .0
New York . . . . . . . . . . . . 171,581 221,058 28 .8 82,461 106,906 29 .6 89,120 114,152 28 .1 51 .9 51 .6
North Carolina . . . . . . . . 131,736 184,082 39 .7 99,551 122,110 22 .7 32,185 61,972 92 .5 24 .4 33 .7
North Dakota . . . . . . . . . 35,228 42,996 22 .1 31,329 36,591 16 .8 3,899 6,405 64 .3 11 .1 14 .9
Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,075 90,124 18 .5 24,486 25,292 3 .3 51,589 64,832 25 .7 67 .8 71 .9
Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . 391,949 482,760 23 .2 273,230 321,687 17 .7 118,719 161,073 35 .7 30 .3 33 .4
Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,667 109,223 27 .5 45,211 53,203 17 .7 40,456 56,020 38 .5 47 .2 51 .3
Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . 52,650 81,092 54 .0 18,348 26,843 46 .3 34,302 54,249 58 .2 65 .2 66 .9
Rhode Island . . . . . . . . . 10,725 14,394 34 .2 5,121 6,058 18 .3 5,604 8,336 48 .8 52 .3 57 .9
South Carolina . . . . . . . . 27,456 42,171 53 .6 13,718 19,524 42 .3 13,738 22,647 64 .8 50 .0 53 .7
South Dakota . . . . . . . . . 68,281 82,073 20 .2 62,283 71,817 15 .3 5,998 10,256 71 .0 8 .8 12 .5
Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . 39,188 54,874 40 .0 15,152 19,994 32 .0 24,036 34,880 45 .1 61 .3 63 .6
Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215,599 315,264 46 .2 118,362 170,972 44 .4 97,237 144,292 48 .4 45 .1 45 .8
Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,445 50,064 23 .8 29,684 32,927 10 .9 10,761 17,137 59 .3 26 .6 34 .2
Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,396 7,379 15 .4 2,420 2,207 -8 .8 3,976 5,172 30 .1 62 .2 70 .1
Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,864 80,924 53 .1 21,172 29,225 38 .0 31,692 51,699 63 .1 60 .0 63 .9
Washington . . . . . . . . . . 158,940 198,998 25 .2 93,301 103,869 11 .3 65,639 95,129 44 .9 41 .3 47 .8
West Virginia . . . . . . . . . 10,644 13,314 25 .1 3,606 3,787 5 .0 7,038 9,527 35 .4 66 .1 71 .6
Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . 69,386 86,228 24 .3 47,228 54,526 15 .5 22,158 31,702 43 .1 31 .9 36 .8
Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,012 18,596 23 .9 11,133 13,336 19 .8 3,879 5,260 35 .6 25 .8 28 .3
Puerto Rico . . . . . . . . . 26,871 35,753 33 .1 13,336 19,839 48 .8 13,535 15,914 17 .6 50 .4 44 .5
Sources: U .S . Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table PL1; and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law
94-171) Summary File, Table P1 .
U.S. Census Bureau 7
8. Figure 3.
Percentage Distribution of the American Indian and Alaska Native Population
by State: 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see
www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
American Indian
and Alaska Native CA OK AZ TX NY All other states
alone or in 13.9 9.2 6.8 6.0 4.2 59.9
combination
American Indian CA OK AZ NM TX All other states
and Alaska
Native alone 12.4 11.0 10.1 6.6 5.8 54.1
American Indian CA OK TX NY WA All other states
and Alaska Native
in combination 15.8 7.0 6.3 5.0 4.2 61.8
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 due to rounding.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.
more additional races. California Delaware, New Jersey, and Georgia The American Indian and
and Oklahoma had the two larg- experienced the fastest growth Alaska Native population
est shares of the American Indian rates of the American Indian and was highly concentrated in
and Alaska Native in combination Alaska Native alone population. counties in Oklahoma.
population. However, Texas had the The American Indian and Alaska
third-largest share of the American The American Indian and Native alone-or-in-combination
Indian and Alaska Native in combi- Alaska Native in combination population was highly concentrated
population showed even more
nation population, followed by New in 2010. Of the 3,143 counties
growth compared with the
York and Washington. in the United States, 71 percent
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone-or-in-combination (2,237 counties) had less than 1.5
The American Indian and population. percent of the population identify
Alaska Native alone-or-in- as American Indian alone or in
combination population grew Eighteen states had growth rates
combination with another race, as
in every state between 2000 of more than 50 percent in their
and 2010. shown in light green on Figure 4.
multiple-race American Indian and
In 187 counties, the American
Among all states, the states with Alaska Native population. The
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-
the most substantial American states that experienced the most
in-combination population con-
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or- growth (over 70 percent) were
stituted 8 percent or more of the
in-combination population growth North Carolina, Delaware, and
total county population, as shown
between 2000 and 2010 were South Dakota.
in dark green. Of these counties,
Delaware, Georgia, Pennsylvania, The multiple-race American Indian 55 (29 percent) were in Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Virginia (see and Alaska Native population’s and most of the remaining coun-
Table 2). Each of these five states proportion of the American Indian ties were in the upper Midwest, the
exceeded a 50 percent increase in and Alaska Native alone-or-in- four corners area of the Southwest
American Indian and Alaska Native combination population increased where Arizona, Colorado, New
alone-or-in-combination population. between 2000 and 2010 in all Mexico, and Utah meet, and in
The American Indian and Alaska states except three. Illinois, New Alaska. This pattern was similar
Native alone population also grew Jersey, and New York each experi- for the American Indian and Alaska
in every state except Vermont, enced a slight decrease (see Table 2). Native alone population.
where that population experienced
a decrease of 9 percent in size.
8 U.S. Census Bureau
9. Figure 4.
American Indian and Alaska Native as a Percentage of County
Population: 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see
www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
Alone
Percent
8.0 or more
3.0 to 7.9
1.5 to 2.9
Less than 1.5
American Indian/
Alaska Native Areas
U.S. percent 0.9
Alone or in Combination
Percent
8.0 or more
3.0 to 7.9
1.5 to 2.9
Less than 1.5
American Indian/
Alaska Native Areas
U.S. percent 1.7
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.
U.S. Census Bureau 9
10. Figure 5.
Percent Change in American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN)
Population: 2000 to 2010
(Counties with an American Indian and Alaska Native population of at least 100 in 2010 are included in the maps.
For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see
www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
Alone
Percent change
100.0 or more
50.0 to 99.9
25.0 to 49.9
0.0 to 24.9
Less than 0.0
Fewer than 100
AIAN alone
Not comparable
U.S. change 18.4
Alone or in Combination
Percent change
100.0 or more
50.0 to 99.9
25.0 to 49.9
0.0 to 24.9
Less than 0.0
Fewer than 100 AIAN
alone or in combination
Not comparable
U.S. change 26.7
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table PL1;
Table P1.
and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.
10 U.S. Census Bureau
11. Table 3.
Ten Places With the Largest Number of American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
American Indian and Alaska Native
Place Total Alone or in combination Alone In combination
population Rank Number Rank Number Rank Number
New York, NY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,175,133 1 111,749 1 57,512 1 54,237
Los Angeles, CA. . . . . . . . . . . . 3,792,621 2 54,236 3 28,215 2 26,021
Phoenix, AZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,445,632 3 43,724 2 32,366 7 11,358
Oklahoma City, OK . . . . . . . . . . 579,999 4 36,572 7 20,533 3 16,039
Anchorage, AK . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291,826 5 36,062 5 23,130 6 12,932
Tulsa, OK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391,906 6 35,990 6 20,817 4 15,173
Albuquerque, NM. . . . . . . . . . . . 545,852 7 32,571 4 25,087 16 7,484
Chicago, IL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,695,598 8 26,933 10 13,337 5 13,596
Houston, TX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,099,451 9 25,521 8 14,997 8 10,524
San Antonio, TX. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,327,407 10 20,137 11 11,800 11 8,337
Tucson, AZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520,116 11 19,903 9 14,154 24 5,749
Philadelphia, PA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,526,006 13 17,495 25 6,996 9 10,499
San Diego, CA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,307,402 12 17,865 23 7,696 10 10,169
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.
Generally, counties with larger Counties in the South and across four were in the South, with two in
proportions of American Indians the East Coast experienced a Texas (Houston and San Antonio)
and Alaska Natives tended to be in higher rate of growth in this and two in Oklahoma (Oklahoma
close proximity to American Indian population than counties in the City and Tulsa). This regional
reservations and/or trust lands and West. Interestingly, counties with pattern was similar for both the
Oklahoma tribal statistical areas high concentrations of American American Indian and Alaska Native
(see the areas outlined in orange Indian and Alaska Native popula- alone population and the American
on Figure 4). This was especially tions in such states as California Indian and Alaska Native in combi-
evident in counties throughout the and Oklahoma experienced slower nation population.
West and in counties in Oklahoma. growth compared with counties in
the South and along the East Coast The place with the greatest
The American Indian and which had very small population proportion of American
Alaska Native population Indians and Alaska Natives
concentrations of American Indians
experienced growth in most was Anchorage, AK.
and Alaska Natives.
Among places of 100,000 or more
Among the 2,452 counties in the The place with the largest population in 2010, Anchorage,
United States with an American American Indian and Alaska AK, had the greatest proportion (12
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or- Native population was percent) of American Indians and
New York, NY.
in-combination population of 100 Alaska Natives alone or in combi-
or more people in 2010, 2,227 The 2010 Census showed that New nation (see Table 4). Other places
counties experienced an increase York, NY, had the largest American with large proportions of American
in this population from 2000 to Indian and Alaska Native alone- Indians and Alaska Natives alone
2010 (see Figure 5). There were or-in-combination population with or in combination were Tulsa, OK
80 counties that had an increase 112,000, followed by Los Angeles (9 percent); Norman, OK (8 per-
of 100 percent or more in their (54,000) (see Table 3). This is to be cent); Oklahoma City, OK (6 per-
American Indian and Alaska Native expected since these places have cent); and Billings, MT (6 percent).
alone-or-in-combination popula- the largest total populations in Of the top ten places, six were in
tion from 2000 to 2010, as shown the United States. Four of the ten the West, three were in the South
in dark green. There were 608 places with the largest American (all in Oklahoma), and one was in
counties that had an increase of 50 Indian and Alaska Native alone- the Midwest. These patterns were
percent or more in their American or-in-combination populations similar for the American Indian and
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or- were in the West––Los Angeles, Alaska Native alone population.
in-­combination population. CA; Phoenix, AZ; Anchorage, AK;
and Albuquerque, NM. Another
U.S. Census Bureau 11
12. Table 4.
Ten Places With the Highest Percentage of American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
American Indian and Alaska Native
Alone or in combination Alone In combination
Place1 Percentage Percentage Percentage
Total of total of total of total
population Rank population Rank population Rank population
Anchorage, AK . . . . . . . . . . . 291,826 1 12.4 1 7.9 1 4.4
Tulsa, OK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391,906 2 9.2 2 5.3 2 3.9
Norman, OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110,925 3 8.1 3 4.7 3 3.3
Oklahoma City, OK . . . . . . . . 579,999 4 6.3 7 3.5 4 2.8
Billings, MT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104,170 5 6.0 5 4.4 14 1.5
Albuquerque, NM. . . . . . . . . . 545,852 6 6.0 4 4.6 28 1.4
Green Bay, WI. . . . . . . . . . . . 104,057 7 5.4 6 4.1 36 1.3
Tacoma, WA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198,397 8 4.0 16 1.8 5 2.1
Tempe, AZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161,719 9 3.9 8 2.9 73 1.0
Tucson, AZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520,116 10 3.8 9 2.7 52 1.1
Sioux Falls, SD . . . . . . . . . . . 153,888 13 3.6 10 2.7 79 0.9
Spokane, WA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 208,916 11 3.8 15 2.0 6 1.8
Eugene, OR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,185 24 2.8 55 1.0 7 1.8
Topeka, KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127,473 17 3.1 27 1.4 8 1.7
Sacramento, CA . . . . . . . . . . 466,488 23 2.8 46 1.1 9 1.7
Santa Rosa, CA. . . . . . . . . . . 167,815 15 3.3 18 1.7 10 1.6
1
Places of 100,000 or more total population. The 2010 Census showed 282 places in the United States with 100,000 or more population. They included 273
incorporated places (including 5 city-county consolidations) and 9 census designated places that were not legally incorporated.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.
While the top ten proportional
rankings were very similar for the Figure 6.
American Indian and Alaska Native Percentage Distribution of the American Indian and
alone population and the American Alaska Native Population by American Indian/
Alaska Native Area of Residence: 2010
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and
in-combination population, they definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
were different for the American
American Indian Alaska Native village Outside American Indian/
Indian and Alaska Native in combi- areas1 statistical areas Alaska Native areas
nation population. The American 1.5
Indian and Alaska Native in combi- American Indian
nation population had high propor- and Alaska Native 20.5 78.0
alone or in
tions in the West, but in different combination
18.3 2.2
places. Spokane, WA; Eugene, OR;
American Indian
Sacramento, CA; and Santa Rosa, and Alaska Native 30.7 67.0
CA had four of the ten greatest alone
American Indian and Alaska Native 0.5
in combination proportions. American Indian
and Alaska Native 7.3 92.1
in combination
The majority of the American
Indian and Alaska Native 1
Includes federal American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands, Oklahoma
population lived outside of tribal statistical areas, tribal designated statistical areas, state American Indian reservations,
American Indian and Alaska and state designated American Indian statistical areas.
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 due to rounding.
Native areas.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171)
Summary File, Table P1.
In 2010, the majority of the
American Indian and Alaska Native
alone-or-in-combination popula-
tion (78 percent) lived outside of
American Indian and Alaska Native
12 U.S. Census Bureau
13. Table 5.
American Indian Reservation and Alaska Native Village Statistical Area Population: 2010
(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)
American Indian and Alaska Native Not
American Indian
Area and Alaska
Total Alone or in In Native alone or
population combination Alone combination in combination
Total American Indian areas1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,576,127 1,069,411 901,280 168,131 3,506,716
Total Alaska Native village statistical areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242,613 78,141 65,855 12,286 164,472
Outside American Indian/Alaska Native areas . . . . . . . . . . . . 303,926,798 4,073,027 1,965,113 2,107,914 299,853,771
1
Includes federal reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands, Oklahoma tribal statistical areas, tribal designated statistical areas, state reservations, and
state designated American Indian statistical areas .
Note: In this table, the American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination population and the not American Indian and Alaska Native
alone-or-in-combination population add to the total population for each area .
Source: U .S . Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1 .
areas (see Figure 6). In comparison, (i.e., federal reservation and/or off- The proportion of the American
the proportion of the American reservation trust land, Oklahoma Indian and Alaska Native alone pop-
Indian and Alaska Native alone pop- tribal statistical area, state reserva- ulation living inside Alaska Native
ulation living outside of American tion, or federal- or state-designated village statistical areas (2 percent)
Indian and Alaska Native areas was American Indian statistical area).21 in 2010 was higher compared with
somewhat lower (67 percent), while The proportion of the American the American Indian and Alaska
the vast majority of the American Indian and Alaska Native alone pop- Native alone-or-in-combination
Indian and Alaska Native in combi- ulation that lived inside American population. The proportion of the
nation population (92 percent) lived Indian areas was 31 percent, American Indian and Alaska Native
outside American Indian and Alaska while a smaller proportion of the in combination population living
Native areas. American Indian and Alaska Native inside Alaska Native village statisti-
in combination population (7 per- cal areas was 1 percent. Patterns
These proportions were similar to
cent) lived inside American Indian were similar for the proportion of
Census 2000, when 75 percent of
areas in 2010. Patterns were similar the American Indian and Alaska
the American Indian and Alaska
for the proportion of the American Native population living inside
Native alone-or-in-combination
Indian and Alaska Native popula- Alaska Native village statistical
population lived outside American
tion that lived inside American areas in 2000.
Indian and Alaska Native areas,
Indian areas in 2000.
as did 64 percent of the American Most people living in American
Indian and Alaska Native alone The American Indian and Indian areas and in Alaska
population and 92 percent of the Alaska Native alone population Native village statistical areas
American Indian and Alaska Native was more likely than the did not identify as American
in combination population.20 American Indian and Alaska Indian and Alaska Native.
Native in combination
Of the total U.S. population (308.7
A greater proportion of the population to live inside
Alaska Native village million), about 4.6 million indi-
American Indian and Alaska
statistical areas. viduals lived in American Indian
Native alone population
lived inside American Indian areas and about 243,000 individu-
Individuals living inside Alaska
areas than did the American als lived in Alaska Native village
Native village statistical areas made
Indian and Alaska Native in statistical areas (see Table 5). This
combination population. up 1 percent of the total American
means that 98 percent of the U.S.
Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-
According to the 2010 Census, population (303.9 million people)
in-combination population in 2010.
20 percent of the American Indian lived outside of American Indian
and Alaska Native alone-or-in- and Alaska Native areas.
21
For information on American Indian and
combination population lived Alaska Native areas, see the 2010 Census
Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Of all people that lived in American
inside an American Indian area Summary File—Technical Documentation at Indian areas, 1.1 million identified
20
Information on the Census 2000 /pl94-171.pdf> and the wall map, American as American Indian and Alaska
American Indian and Alaska Native population Indians and Alaska Natives in the United Native alone or in combination
living in American Indian and Alaska Native States at areas can be found in PCT1 tables in Census /aian2010_wall_map/aian_wall_map.html>. with another race, compared with
2000 Summary File 2.
U.S. Census Bureau 13